The Guelph Record

Committee of Adjustment

August 8, 2024

What was decided (25 motions)

19 carried, 6 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.

That the minutes from the July 11, 2024 Regular Hearing of the Committee of Adjustment, be approved as circulated.
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by J. Goodfellow
Carried
That minor variance application file B-43/24 2162 Gordon Street be
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Deferred
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Lot 7, Plan 430 currently known as 10 Orchard Crescent, a parcel of land (noted as lands to be severed 2) with frontage along Orchard Crescent of 7.6 metres, and an area of 349 square metres substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 33174-24, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, a plan shall be submitted to, and approved by the General Manager of Planning and Building Services, for the new dwellings indicating the location and design of the new dwelling. 2. That prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy City owned trees, the applicant shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan (TIPP) prepared by a Certified Arborist for approval and to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. Any City owned tree(s) approved for removal or injury may be subject to compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. 3. That prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official, the owner(s) shall provide to the City, to the satisfaction of the General Manager/City Engineer, a stormwater management and functional servicing report for the severed and retained lands that has been prepared in accordance with the City of Guelph’s Develop
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by P. Membreño
Defeated
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Lot 7, Plan 430 currently known as 10 Orchard Crescent, a parcel of land (noted as lands to be severed 3) with frontage along Orchard Crescent of 7.6 metres, and an area of 349 square metres substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 33174-24, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, a plan shall be submitted to, and approved by the General Manager of Planning and Building Services, for the new dwellings indicating the location and design of the new dwelling. 2. That prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy City owned trees, the applicant shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan (TIPP) prepared by a Certified Arborist for approval and to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. Any City owned tree(s) approved for removal or injury may be subject to compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. 3. That prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official, the owner(s) shall provide to the City, to the satisfaction of the General Manager/City Engineer, a stormwater management and functional servicing report for the severed and retained lands that has been prepared in accordance with the City of Guelph’s Develop
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by P. Membreño
Defeated
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Table 5.10 Row 1, Section 5.11.2 (a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 10 Orchard Crescent (noted as lands to be severed 1), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. a maximum driveway width of 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum residential driveway width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; c. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line abutting a street line, and where a roofed porch is pro
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by P. Membreño
Defeated
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Table 5.10 Row 1, Section 5.11.2 (a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 14 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 10 Orchard Crescent (noted as lands to be severed 2), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. a maximum driveway width of 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum residential driveway width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; c. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line ab
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by P. Membreño
Defeated
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Lot 7, Plan 430 currently known as 10 Orchard Crescent, a parcel of land (noted as lands to be severed 1) with frontage along Orchard Crescent of 7.6 metres, and an area of 347 square metres substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 33174-24, be refused. Reason: This consent application is refused, as it is the opinion of the Committee that this application does not meet the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act to which all consent applications must adhere, specifically being that the proposed severance is not compatible with the neighbourhood due to concerns regarding parking, traffic, lack of sidewalks, erosion, and stormwater management. Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 19 Any and all written submissions relating to this application that were made to the Committee of Adjustment before its decision and any and all oral submissions related to this application that were made at a public hearing, held under the Planning Act, have been, on balance, taken into consideration by the Committee of Adjustment as part of its deliberations and final decision on this matter.
Moved by A. Balaban, seconded by R. Speers
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Lot 7, Plan 430 currently known as 10 Orchard Crescent, a parcel of land (noted as lands to be severed 2) with frontage along Orchard Crescent of 7.6 metres, and an area of 349 square metres substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 33174-24, be refused. Reason: This consent application is refused, as it is the opinion of the Committee that this application does not meet the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act to which all consent applications must adhere, specifically being that the proposed severance is not compatible with the neighbourhood due to concerns regarding parking, traffic, lack of sidewalks, erosion, and stormwater management. Any and all written submissions relating to this application that were made to the Committee of Adjustment before its decision and any and all oral submissions related to this application that were made at a public hearing, held under the Planning Act, have been, on balance, taken into consideration by the Committee of Adjustment as part of its deliberations and final decision on this matter.
Moved by A. Balaban, seconded by R. Speers
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Lot 7, Plan 430 currently known as 10 Orchard Crescent, a parcel of land (noted as lands to be severed 3 ) with frontage along Orchard Crescent of 7.6 metres, and an area of 349 square metres substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 33174-24, be refused. Reason: This consent application is refused, as it is the opinion of the Committee that this application does not meet the criteria under section 51(24) of the Planning Act to which all consent applications must adhere, specifically being that the proposed severance is not compatible with the neighbourhood due to concerns regarding parking, traffic, lack of sidewalks, erosion, and stormwater management. Any and all written submissions relating to this application that were made to the Committee of Adjustment before its decision and any and all oral submissions related to this application that were made at a public hearing, held under the Planning Act, have been, on balance, taken into consideration by the Committee of Adjustment as part of its deliberations and final decision on this matter.
Moved by A. Balaban, seconded by R. Speers
Carried
Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 21 That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Table 5.10 Row 1, Section 5.11.2 (a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 10 Orchard Crescent (noted as lands to be severed 1), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. a maximum driveway width of 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum residential driveway width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; c. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line ab
Moved by A. Balaban, seconded by R. Speers
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Table 5.10 Row 1, Section 5.11.2 (a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 10 Orchard Crescent (noted as lands to be severed 2), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. a maximum driveway width of 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum residential driveway width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; c. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 23 not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line ab
Moved by A. Balaban, seconded by R. Speers
Carried
Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 24 That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Table 5.10 Row 1, Section 5.11.2 (a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 10 Orchard Crescent (noted as lands to be severed 3), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50% of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. a maximum driveway width of 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi-detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum residential driveway width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 60 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; c. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line ab
Moved by A. Balaban, seconded by R. Speers
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 6.3, Section 5.11.2(a), Section 5.9, and Table 5.3 Row 20 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended for 191 Kortright Road West, to permit: a. a maximum exterior side yard of 13 metres, when the By-law requires a maximum exterior side yard of 10 metres; b. the existing attached garage to project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space orientated towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line abutting a street line; c. 0 electric vehicle parking spaces and 0 designed electric vehicle parking spaces, when the By-law requires a minimum of 20% of the total required parking spaces for multi-unit buildings with 3 or more dwelling units and mixed-use buildings on lots identified with a (PA) suffix shall be provided as electric vehicle parking spaces; and d. a minimum of 2 parking spaces for the proposed triplex, when the By-law requires a minimum of 1 parking space per dwelling unit [total of 3 parking spaces required for 3 dwelling units], Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 28 be approved, subject to the following condition: 1. The applicant shall submit an erosion and sediment control plan to the satisfa
Moved by J. Goodfellow, seconded by P. Membreño
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Part Lots 20 and 21, Plan 565, currently known as 67 and 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West, a parcel of land (noted as Severed Parcel 1) with frontage along College Avenue West of 12.7 metres, and an area of 535 square metres, substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 32967-23, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy private trees, the applicant shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan (TIPP) undertaken by a Certified Arborist, in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Tree Technical Manual and to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Planning and Building Services. 2. There is also a City owned tree fronting 94 University Avenue West. Therefore prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy City trees, the TIPP must also be to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. Any City owned tree(s) approved for removal or injury may be subject to compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. 3. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the proposed dwellings be constructed in general accordance with the drawings
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Lots 20 and 21, Plan 565, currently known as 67 and 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West, a parcel of land (noted as Severed Parcel 3) with frontage along College Avenue West of 8.3 metres, and an area of 350 square metres, substantially in accordance Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 37 with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 32967-23, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy private trees, the applicant shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan (TIPP) undertaken by a Certified Arborist, in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Tree Technical Manual and to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Planning and Building Services. 2. There is also a City owned tree fronting 94 University Avenue West. Therefore prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy City trees, the TIPP must also be to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. Any City owned tree(s) approved for removal or injury may be subject to compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. 3. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the proposed dwellings be const
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Part Lots 20 and 21, Plan 565, and Part of Lot 10, Plan 283, currently known as 67 and 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West, a parcel of land (noted as Severed Parcel 4) with frontage along College Avenue West of 8.3 metres, and an area of 364 square metres, substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 32967-23, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy private trees, the applicant shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan (TIPP) Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 41 undertaken by a Certified Arborist, in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Tree Technical Manual and to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Planning and Building Services. 2. There is also a City owned tree fronting 94 University Avenue West. Therefore prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy City trees, the TIPP must also be to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. Any City owned tree(s) approved for removal or injury may be subject to compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. 3. That prior to the issuance of a building perm
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 53(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, consent for severance of Part Lot 10, Plan 283, currently known as 67 and 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West a parcel of land (noted as Severed Parcel 5) with frontage along College Avenue West of 7.7 metres, and an area of 350 square metres, substantially in accordance with a sketch prepared by Van Harten Surveying Inc., dated July 9, 2024, project number 32967-23, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy private trees, the applicant shall submit a Tree Preservation Plan (TIPP) undertaken by a Certified Arborist, in accordance with the requirements of the City’s Tree Technical Manual and to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Planning and Building Services. Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 45 2. There is also a City owned tree fronting 94 University Avenue West. Therefore prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Official and/or prior to undertaking activities which may injure or destroy City trees, the TIPP must also be to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. Any City owned tree(s) approved for removal or injury may be subject to compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks. 3. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, the proposed dwellings be construct
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Section 5.11.2(a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West (noted as Severed Parcel 1), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi- detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line abutting a street line, and where a roofed porch is provided, the attached garage may be located Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 49 ahead of the main front wall, to a maximum projection of 2 metres; c. a minimum floor area of 20 square metres for the proposed attached garage, when the By-law requires an attached garage fo
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Section 5.11.2(a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 50 Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West (noted as Severed Parcel 2), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi- detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line abutting a street line, and where a roofed porch is provided, the attached garage may be located ahead of the main front wall, to a maximum projection of 2 metres; c. a minimum floor area of 20 square metres for the proposed attached garage, when the By-law requires an attached garage fo
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Section 5.11.2(a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 67 and 71 College Avenue West and 94 University Avenue West (noted as Severed Parcel 4), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi- detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 53 attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line abutting a street line, and where a roofed porch is provided, the attached garage may be located ahead of the main front wall, to a maximum projection of 2 metres; c. a minimum floor area of 20 square metres for the proposed attached garage, when the By-law requires an attached ga
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 5.9 Row 1, Section 5.11.2(a), Table 5.2 Additional Regulation 1, and Table 5.3 Row 15 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, or 67 and 71 College Avenue West and 94 University (noted as retained parcel), to permit: a. a maximum attached garage width of 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less, for the proposed semi- detached dwelling, when the By-law requires a maximum attached garage width for a semi-detached dwelling in a RL.1 Zone to be 50 percent of the lot frontage or 5 metres, whichever is less; b. the proposed attached garage to project a maximum of 2 metres beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line abutting a street line, as a roofed porch is proposed, when the By-law Committee of Adjustment Minutes: August 8, 2024 - 56 requires that within residential zones, attached garages shall not project beyond the main front wall of the first storey containing habitable floor space oriented towards the front lot line or exterior side lot line abutting a street line, and where a roofed porch is provided, the attached garage may be located ahead of the main front wall, to a maximum projection of 2 metres; c. a minimum floor area of 20 square metres for the proposed attached garage, when the By-law requires an attached garage for semi-
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, a variance from the requirements of Table 5.11 Row 4 of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 99 Clair Road East, to permit a minimum of 8 stacking spaces for the proposed double stacking lane drive-through for the existing restaurant, when the By-law requires a minimum of 10 stacking spaces for a drive-through facility (restaurant), be approved.
Moved by P. Membreño, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried
That in the matter of an application under Section 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.P13, as amended, variances from the requirements of Table 6.3, Table 6.2, Section 5.9 (a), and Section 5.9 (b) of Zoning By-law (2023)-20790, as amended, for 21 Stevenson Street North, to permit: a. a minimum left side yard of 1.5 metres, when the By-law requires a minimum interior side yard of 1.5 metres; b. no landscaped open space between the residential driveway and the right lot line, when the By-law requires a minimum setback of 0.5 metres between the residential driveway and the nearest lot line must be maintained as landscaped open space in the form of natural vegetation, such as grass, flowers, trees and shrubbery; c. 0 electric vehicle parking spaces, when the By-law requires that a minimum of 20% of the total required parking spaces for multi-unit buildings with 3 more more dwelling units and mixed- use buildings on lots identified with a (PA) suffix shall be provided as electric vehicle parking spaces; and d. 0 designed electric vehicle parking spaces, when the By-law requires that a minimum of 80 percent of the total required parking spaces for multi-unit buildings with 3 or more dwelling units, townhouse – cluster, stacked, stacked back-to-back, and mixed-use buildings shall be provided as designed electric vehicle parking spaces, be approved, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the proposed driveway and parking area be constructed in general accordance with the
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by J. Goodfellow
Carried
That minor variance application file A-60/24 for 201 Elmira Road South, be
Moved by R. Speers, seconded by A. Balaban
Deferred
That this hearing of the Committee of Adjustment be adjourned. (8:15 p.m.)
Moved by J. Goodfellow, seconded by A. Balaban
Carried

The town’s own record

Read the minutes this page was read from →

Where this page and that document disagree, the document is right and this record is wrong. Say so and it will be corrected.